Looking for the Access to
Justice Research Network
(AJRN)? Click here

The Rule of Law in Canada: Highlights from the World Justice Project 2014 Rule of Law Index

The rule of law is a legal principle that States should be governed by law alone, and that every individual, private entity and public entity must be held accountable by the law, including the government.  The World Justice Project (WJP) – an independent, multidisciplinary organization – defines the rule of law as a system which,

  • Ensures accountability under the law
  • Embodies laws that are clear, publicized, stable and just, and which are created by a process that is efficient, accessible and fair
  • And delivers justice that is timely by competent, ethical and independent representatives.

Since 2008, the WJP has annually published a Rule of Law Index, which offers a detailed and multidimensional view of the extent to which countries around the world adhere to the rule of law principle in practice. The 2014 WJP Rule of Law Index ranks 99 countries throughout the world on 9 components of the rule of law comprised of 47 separate measures. In Canada, data is gathered by means of on-line surveys of individuals in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal, as well as interviews with academics and other justice system specialists.

The value of the WJP rule of law index is that it makes the concept of the rule of law concrete and shows us where we might look to make improvements.  It does this, first, by defining a set of common constituent elements – factors relevant to the rule of law– and, second, by ranking countries, which score higher than Canada on comparable measures. A defining feature of the index is that it “puts people at its core by looking at a nation’s adherence to the rule of law from the perspective of ordinary individuals who are directly affected by the degree of adherence to the rule of law in those societies.”

Canada has an overall score of 0.78 out of 1.00. We rank 11th out of 99 countries included in the survey worldwide, 11th among 30 high income countries, and 8th among 24 North American and Western European countries – behind Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands, Austria and Germany. Canada ranks above the U.K., which sits at the 13th position within the regional group, and the U.S. in 19th position.

1. Constraints on Powers

Rule of Law Dimension: measures the extent to which those who govern are bound by law. It comprises the means by which government power is limited, including non-governmental checks, such as free and independent press.

Canada’s Rank: 13th

Top 3 Countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden

2. Absence of Corruption

Rule of Law Dimension: measures three forms of corruption – bribery, improper influence by public or private interest, and misappropriation of public funds or other resources.

Canada’s Rank: 14

Top 3 Countries: Denmark, Norway, and New Zealand

3. Open Government

Rule of Law Dimension: measures the extent to which society has clear, publicized, accessible and stable laws, including whether administrative proceedings and official information is available to the public.

Canada’s Rank: 3rd

Top 3 Countries: Sweden, Denmark, and Norway

4. Fundamental Rights

Rule of Law Dimension: includes effective enforcement of laws that ensure equal protection; the right to life, liberty and security of the person; due process of law and rights of the accused; freedom of opinion and expression; freedom of belief and religion; the right of privacy; freedom of assembly and association; and fundamental labour rights.

Canada’s Rank: 16th

Top 3 Countries: Sweden, Denmark, and Norway

5. Order and Security

Rule of Law Dimension: includes three dimensions covering the various threats to order and security – crime, political violence, and violence as a socially acceptable means to redress grievances.

Canada’s Rank: 15th

Top 3 Countries: Japan, Singapore, and Denmark

6. Regulatory Enforcement

Rule of Law Dimension: measures whether regulations and administrative provisions are enforced effectively, and are applied and enforced without improper influence of public officials or private interests.

Canada’s Rank: 9th

Top 3 Countries: Norway, Denmark, and Sweden

7. Civil Justice

Rule of Law Dimension: measures whether the system is accessible and affordable, free of discrimination, and free of corruption and improper influence of public officials. Court proceedings must be conducted efficiently and may not be subject to unreasonable delays.

Canada’s Rank: 13th

Top 3 Countries: Norway, Netherlands, and Germany

8. Criminal Justice

Rule of Law Dimension: measures whether the criminal justice system is capable of investigating and adjudicating criminal offenses successfully and in a timely manner through a system that is impartial, non-discriminatory, and free of corruption and improper government influence.

Canada’s Rank: 15th<

Top 3 Countries: Finland, Singapore, and Denmark

*Factor 9, informal justice, was not ranked.

Where Canada stands in the world with regard to civil justice is of special interest. There are several factors affecting Canada’s performance in protecting and strengthening civil justice. The table below gives the scores for Canada in relation to seven components for the civil justice factor.

Table gives the scores for Canada in relation to seven components for the civil justice factor

According to the WJP index, accessibility and affordability and unreasonable delays are the most problematic aspects of civil justice in Canada. Among Western European and North American Countries the average score is 0.60 on accessibility and affordability and 0.51 on absence of unreasonable delays. Canada ranks considerably lower than Norway, the top ranking country on civil justice, with a score of 0.76 for accessibility and affordability and 0.84 for absence of unreasonable delays.

Canadian Forum on Civil Justice launches the Access to Justice Research Network

The CFCJ is pleased to announce the launch of the national Access to Justice Research Network (AJRN), an interactive and participatory online network of access to justice researchers in Canada. Coordinated by the CFCJ and supported by a generous grant from the Law Foundation of BC/Legal Services Society Research Fund, the AJRN creates a vibrant space for discussion, collaboration, and coordination of research related to access to justice (A2J).

Combining a listserv and website, the AJRN allows users to easily exchange resources, including scholarly articles, key research findings, case commentaries, best practices, policy reports, etc., while also creating an active online space for discussion and debate on A2J issues. ARJN members are invited to circulate and discuss A2J resources and research via the AJRN listserv (see below for how you can join the listserv), this material will then be posted to the AJRN website where it is organized by topic, region, and type of resource. Using this two-pronged approach the AJRN aims to create a “clearinghouse” of research, reports, policy documents, and news items, making the latest research in A2J easy to find.

Although only launched in its prototype form last month, the network already has over 40 members, and the website already contains materials related to technology and online dispute resolution, family justice, innovation, legal services delivery and alternative business structures.

Over the next several months the CFCJ will be working with partners from across the country to improve the network and increase the ability of users to share resources and coordinate with one another. We will also be working with the national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters to develop ways to use the platform to encourage collaboration and exchange among the emerging local A2J groups, and other justice stakeholders.

The AJRN responds to a growing need for a national online information sharing platform that allows justice stakeholders to quickly and easily share their knowledge of the exciting new access to justice work happening across the country. It will stimulate dialogue and knowledge exchange helping to build ties among access to justice researchers across the country and boost the impact of access to justice resources and initiatives underway in Canada.

To join the access to justice conversation, sign up for the AJRN listserv by sending an email to communications@cfcj-fcjc.org with “AJRN subscribe” indicated in the subject line. Or visit the website at www.ajrn.org.

The Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters Convenes a Meeting of Provincial and Territorial A2J Groups

On March 13, 2015 the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters convened a meeting in Toronto for provincial and territorial access to justice groups. The groups, many of which were formed in response to recommendation 5.1 of the Action Committee’s Final Report (Fall 2013), met to discuss access to justice initiatives in their jurisdictions, highlight promising developments, and consider how to further collaborations and cooperation among justice stakeholders.

The meeting highlighted key issues of relationship building between local and national access to justice groups, public education and engagement, and innovation with the justice system. Discussions also included examining existing and potential groups structures, as well as the development of inclusive communication platforms and approaches to system wide A2J collaboration amongst the groups and with the public.

In preparation for the meeting, the provincial and territorial groups responded to a questionnaire prepared by the Action Committee. Some examples of the questionnaire responses include the following from: Quebec, Newfoundland & Labrador, and Nova Scotia. We anticipate posting more provincial and territorial updates as they become publicly available.

A full report on the meeting will be released this spring.

For more information on the Action Committee, visit: www.cfcj-fcjc.org/action-committee.