Français

Inventory of Reforms

Nova Scotia Application in Court (Rules 5.07-5.09)

DescriptionSupreme Court of Nova Scotia rule introducing a new form of summary trial intended as a speedy, flexible alternative to a trial.
StatusPermanent Implementation
JurisdictionNova Scotia
CourtSupreme Court of Nova Scotia
Subjects
  • rules of court
  • summary trials
  • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Timeline 
February 2008Draft Rules received tentative approval
June 2008Rules formally approved
January 2009Rules went into effect
Publications
Development
Following a comprehensive review and revision of the Civil Procedure Rules, the new Rules, including Rule 5 governing Applications, were formally approved in June, 2008 and went into effect on January 1, 2009.
Purpose
"The application in court is for longer hearings, and it is available, in appropriate circumstances, as a flexible and speedy alternative to an action" (r. 5.01(4)).
Description of reforms
Applications under the new Rules are original proceedings. Application in court is a unique form of summary trial created by Rule 5, along with two other originating applications (ex parte and applications in chambers). It allows for a broad range of disclosure "through the lists of possible witnesses and subjects of their evidence and through the motion for directions, which allows for disclosure of documents and electronic information, discovery, substitution of will say statements for affidavits and disclosure of expert opinions" (Training Materials, Module 2 at 11).

Highlights of the Applications in Court

Rules 5.07-5.09 govern applications in court, a new type of proceeding intended as a speedy, flexible alternative to a trial. The court expects that applications in court under R.5 will proceed to hearing considerably faster than actions under R.4, or even actions under $100,000 in R.57 and R.58. Another feature in favour of applications in court is that there is no presumptive time limit for discovery, as there is under R.57.10(3).

Unlike the previous R.9.02, substantial disputes of fact are permitted, if they can be resolved in a summary way.

An application in court is commenced using Form 5.07 and is accompanied by a motion for directions that must be heard no more than 25 days after filing. (This will necessitate prompt service on the responding parties.) Motions for directions are heard in chambers, by appointment, or by conference, as the judge directs (R.5.09(1)).

The motion for directions is accompanied by an affidavit, which may come from counsel, containing the details necessary for the court to fix a hearing date. The applicant's affidavits need not accompany the notice, but the applicant must set out the names of witnesses who will provide affidavits and describe the subjects about which each witness could give evidence. Judges have broad case management powers on the motion for directions (R.5.09(2)), including ordering disclosure, permitting or limiting discovery, ordering cross-examination out of court, limiting the subjects of or time for cross-examination at the hearing, setting dates for filing affidavits and briefs, setting the hearing date, and giving any other necessary directions. The Rule does not refer to settlement conferences, and the language of 5.09(2)(n) speaks only of organizing the application, but there is no obvious reason why a settlement conference could not be ordered under R.5.

As with an application in chambers, an application in court is defended by filing a notice of contest within 5 days (R.5.08). The notice requires fairly detailed knowledge of the case including the status of disclosure, whether discovery is requested, a list of the respondent's witnesses and all other possible witnesses known to the respondent, along with the subjects of each witness's evidence. As with the application, R.5.08 does not require that the respondent actually file affidavits at this point.
Training Materials, Module 2 at 9-10

Presumption of Application

Under Rule 6.02(3), if either of the following can be established, then an application is presumed to be preferable to an action:
  • substantive rights asserted by a party will be eroded in the time it will take to bring an action to trial, and the erosion will be significantly lessened if the dispute is resolved by application;
  • the court is requested to hold several hearings in one proceeding, such as with some proceedings for corporate reorganization.

Converting Action to Application

Under Rule 6.02(5), if a motion is brought to convert a proceeding from an action to an application, the following factors in favour of an application are considered:
  • the parties can quickly ascertain who their important witnesses will be;
  • the parties can be ready to be heard in months, rather than years;
  • the hearing is of predictable length and content;
  • the evidence is such that credibility can satisfactorily be assessed by considering the whole of the evidence to be presented at the hearing, including affidavit evidence, permitted direct testimony, and crossexamination.
Revision History
  • This summary was created on 2009-08-19
  • It was last reviewed to ensure currency on 2009-08-19

Submit update

If you have updates, changes, or additional information regarding this reform, please contact our Librarian, Brad Albrecht, at balbrecht@cfcj-fcjc.orgPDF.